Documents obtained by Reporters indicate that a DSS personnel was queried after reporting that security correspondence, including a January 2026 warning of a possible attack in Qua’an Pan, allegedly remained at the Plateau Government House.
By Anaga Dalaba
ABUJA, September 18, 2026 — Fresh questions have emerged over the handling of security intelligence intended for Plateau State Governor, Caleb Mutfwang, following documents and accounts indicating that a Department of State Services (DSS) officer was queried after raising concerns that official reports delivered to the Government House in Jos were allegedly not reaching the governor.
The documents, allegedly centre on correspondence reportedly sent by the DSS to the Plateau State Government House, including intelligence concerning potential attacks, possible communal violence and the risk of reprisal attacks capable of endangering lives and property.
One of the documents reportedly dated January 30, 2026, warned of the presence of an armed militia and a potential attack in Qua’an Pan Local Government Area.
The allegations raise questions about the chain of custody of sensitive security intelligence after it leaves a security agency and reaches a state government office—and whether warnings intended for the state’s highest political authority were reaching their destination in time.
January 30 Intelligence Report Warned of Possible Attack
According to the documents reviewed by Reporters, one of the intelligence reports was addressed to the Executive Governor of Plateau State at the Government House, Little Rayfield, Jos.
The report reportedly carried the subject “Presence Of Armed Militia” and warned of a possible threat to communities in Qua’an Pan Local Government Area.
The intelligence reportedly indicated the presence of an armed group and assessed that its activities could constitute a threat of an imminent attack on the affected area and surrounding communities.
The report also reportedly stated that security agencies were working together to maintain vigilance and intensify patrols around the affected communities.
Residents and community stakeholders were urged to provide timely information to security agencies to facilitate prompt intervention.
The significance of the alleged document lies in the allegation that, despite being addressed to the governor, it allegedly remained among correspondence held at the Government House.
DSS Officer Says He Discovered Unanswered Correspondence
The controversy reportedly came to light on February 1, 2026, when a DSS officer serving as a duty officer at the Plateau State Command visited the Government House to deliver official correspondence.
According to his written response to a subsequent query, the officer was allegedly informed by a Government House official that several earlier DSS communications were still in his custody and had not reached the governor.
The officer described the discovery as disturbing and said it prompted him to alert his superiors.
Sources told Reporters that the Government House official allegedly produced older DSS correspondence kept in a drawer.
The DSS officer subsequently photographed some of the documents.
In his response to the query, the officer explained that the photographs were taken as evidence to enable him report the matter to senior DSS officials and request an investigation.
“This and nothing beyond this was what necessitated the snapping of the mails,” the officer stated in the response cited by Reporters.
Officer Subsequently Queried Over Photographs
The officer’s action subsequently became the subject of disciplinary scrutiny.
A copy of a DSS query dated February 17, 2026, obtained reportedly accused him of collecting five sealed mails previously delivered to the Government House, opening them and photographing their contents with a personal mobile phone without authorisation.
The action was described in the query as unbecoming of a member of the Service, while the photographs were reportedly said to have been taken for an “unknown ulterior motive”.
The officer was directed to explain within 48 hours why disciplinary action should not be taken against him.
In his response dated February 18, 2026, however, he rejected the suggestion that he acted with an ulterior motive.
He reportedly maintained that he photographed the documents after being informed that DSS correspondence was allegedly not reaching the governor and after being shown old correspondence that had reportedly remained at the Government House.
According to his explanation, the photographs were intended to enable him report the matter to the State Director and request “proper investigation and action”.
Officer Says He Reported Matter to Senior DSS Official
The officer further stated that he subsequently reported the matter to a senior officer in the operations department.
He said the officer promised to escalate the issue to the State Director.
Sources also alleged that the DSS personnel later sent a WhatsApp message directly to the command director, attaching a photograph of one of the intelligence reports.
According to the sources, the director acknowledged receipt of the complaint and indicated that the matter would be addressed.
The circumstances thereafter form one of the central unresolved questions in the case.
Sources alleged that instead of the alleged failure to transmit the intelligence becoming the primary focus of an investigation, the DSS officer became the subject of disciplinary proceedings.
Dismissal Claim Not Established By Documents Reviewed
The sources further alleged that the officer was subjected to what they described as a “shallow investigation”, transferred to DSS headquarters in Abuja and eventually dismissed from the Service.
However, an important distinction emerges from the documents made available .
While the documents establish that the officer was queried over the handling and photographing of sealed correspondence, they do not, on their own, establish the reason for his eventual dismissal or conclusively demonstrate that the dismissal was a direct consequence of his complaint about the alleged non-delivery of intelligence.
That distinction is critical in assessing the allegations.
In his response to the query, the officer reportedly pleaded that any breach of service procedure was an oversight rather than a deliberate attempt to compromise DSS operations.
He also stated that he had served for approximately five years without previously being found wanting over service rules or ethics and described the incident as his first offence.
Allegations About Handling of Intelligence at Government House
Sources familiar with the matter alleged that several security reports were affected.
One source claimed that the reports contained intelligence concerning possible attacks by armed groups, potential attacks involving different communities and possible reprisal violence.
“Most of these reports contain critical intelligence on planned attack by Fulani militia or native or even reprisal attack that may cause the lives and property of the residents of the state,” the source alleged.
A top source further alleged that the governor was effectively “blindsided” by the alleged failure of some reports to reach him.
The source attributed the alleged problem to the governor’s chief detail.
“Most of the report sent from DSS office do not always reach the intended recipient,” the source alleged.
The same source further claimed that reports were sometimes kept in the chief detail’s vehicle or room and alleged that previous cautions had not resulted in effective action.
These allegations could not be independently verified by A1NEWS International.
Additional Allegations Concerning Allowances
The same source also made allegations concerning allowances reportedly meant for DSS personnel operating under the chief detail.
The source alleged that the chief detail had, on several occasions, withheld allowances, including plainclothes allowances.
A specific allegation was made that the governor had reportedly approved ₦300,000 for each officer, but that the full amount allegedly did not reach all personnel.
Another source made separate allegations concerning the chief detail’s conduct but provided no independently verifiable evidence to substantiate the claims.
Those allegations remain unverified.
Governor’s Spokesperson Declines Comment
When contacted over the allegations, Gyang Bere, spokesperson to Governor Mutfwang, declined to comment on the DSS-related issues.
“I have nothing to say as regards the DSS affairs because I’m just the Plateau State (Governor’s) spokesperson not DSS spokesperson,” Bere was quoted as saying.
The response leaves unanswered questions about whether the Plateau State Government was aware of the alleged handling of the reports and whether the governor personally received the January 30 intelligence report.
A1NEWS International also has not established an official DSS position on the broader allegations concerning the handling of intelligence or the reported outcome of the officer’s disciplinary case.
Qua’an Pan Attack Highlights Stakes of Intelligence Flow
The controversy assumes greater significance because of the security situation in Qua’an Pan earlier in January.
On January 2, 2026, gunmen attacked Bong village in Doemak District, Qua’an Pan Local Government Area, killing at least seven people and injuring others, according to contemporaneous
media reported that eyewitnesses described a house-to-house attack, while local authorities confirmed the incident but initially said the exact casualty figure was still being established.
The incident therefore provides important context for the reported January 30 intelligence document, although the available material does not establish that the January 30 report predicted or directly related to the January 2 attack.
That distinction is important because the reported security document post-dates the Bong village attack.
Plateau Government Continues To Emphasise Intelligence Sharing
The broader issue of intelligence gathering and timely information sharing remains central to Plateau’s security response.
As recently as September 3, 2026, Governor Mutfwang convened a State Security Council meeting in Jos and directed security agencies to strengthen intelligence gathering, inter-agency collaboration and preventive operations in response to emerging threats.
The Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation also reported in September that the governor had directed increased intelligence gathering and security operations in response to reported security concerns in the state.
Against that backdrop, allegations that sensitive intelligence may have been delayed or withheld before reaching the governor raise questions about the effectiveness of the communication channels connecting intelligence agencies with the state’s political leadership.
Unanswered Questions Over Security Intelligence Chain
The documents and allegations reviewed by SaharaReporters raise a series of questions that remain unresolved.
Were DSS intelligence reports delivered to the Plateau Government House but not transmitted to the governor?
Who had responsibility for receiving and forwarding the correspondence?
Was the January 30 intelligence report ultimately received by Governor Mutfwang?
What investigation, if any, was conducted into the alleged failure to transmit the reports?
And perhaps most significantly, what was the eventual outcome of the DSS disciplinary proceedings against the officer who raised the concern?
The available documents establish that the officer was queried over his handling and photographing of sealed correspondence. They do not independently establish that his eventual dismissal was caused by his complaint about the alleged non-delivery of intelligence.
The allegations concerning the governor’s chief detail, including claims involving security reports and personnel allowances, also remain unverified.
A1NEWS International therefore considers the matter an unresolved accountability issue requiring substantive clarification from the DSS, the Plateau State Government and other relevant authorities—particularly concerning the chain of custody, transmission and acknowledgement of sensitive security intelligence.
Source: SaharaReporters
Leave a Reply